Yes. I understand the opposite of Avery's work. I don't understand the opposite of mine. But, nonetheless, I think the opposite of my work looks like Cliff's. Even though not everything has an opposite. And even if everyone's technique has an opposite, it doesn't mean the opposite is actually a technique that is applicable to glass fusing. And actually, we don't want everything to be opposite, since we want the new pieces to be "beautiful" even though they are the opposite of other pieces that were "beautiful". So, since you came up with this cockamamie scheme, I figured you could give me and Cliff direction. But, if you are going to be nasty about it, we'll just both make pieces with little "Beckman-explosions in them"... and obtain a patent on them.
Just kidding.
Steve
I'm really surprised at you Steve. You just never struck me as the type of student that needed such hand-holding to get through an assignment.
You're kind of a tight-ass, huh?
You keep saying you don't understand, but you DO. (Morgan does this to me every night, just so I'll sit with her while she does her homework.) Here we go -
Doc Steve's work:
1. comprised of many techniques and components in one piece
2. precise
3. exact
4. symmetrical
5. complex assembly
6. most recently, textured and/or hand polished surface
7. reoccuring themes of nature: rainforest, snow, ocean, etc.
8. crisp hard edges, both within the body of the piece and the edge
9. often slumped and footed
Need I go on? (I hope everyone doesn't need this much help
) But the BEST person to describe this work is YOU, Steve - I have only touched the surface here. There are opposite or at the very least, contrasting words or descriptions for every item on this list. Surely you can figure those out, but if not, let me know. (You are taking the fun out of this for yourself, you know.) Now, pick some, doesn't need to be ALL of these contrasting ideas, and begin grouping together what you would "enjoy" seeing put together in a piece. Does that help any?